Corentin Denolly vs Hamza Karmoussi Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W L W L L W L L
Form
W L W L L L L W W LHead To Head: Denolly 1 - 0 Karmoussi
They have played 2 sets in total, with Denolly winning 2 and Karmoussi winning 0. The last match between Denolly and Karmoussi was at the M15 Casablanca, 07-09-2022, First, Clay with Corentin Denolly getting the victory 7-5 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Corentin Denolly | 1 |
| Hamza Karmoussi | 0 |
M15 Casablanca(07-09-2022)
7
5
6
4
| Denolly | Stats | Karmoussi |
|---|---|---|
| 43% (10-13) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 283 | Ranking | N/A |
| 269 | Highest Rank | N/A |
| 27 | Age | 31 |
| L | Plays | - |
| 12 | Titles | 0 |
| 63% (412-245) | Career Total W/L | 43% (12-16) |
| $56,935 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Shelton VS Mensik PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Khachanov VS Paul PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
28 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 6-4 |
Stats 
Corentin Denolly
Player
Hamza Karmoussi
79%
(
52 of
66)
1st Serve %
62%
(
45 of
73)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
77%
(
40 of
52)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
30 of
45)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
19 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
27 of
73)
74
Total Points Won
65
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 9 |
| 5 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:37:0 | Average Match Time | 1:37:0 |
| 79% (52/66) | 1st Serve % | 62% (45/73) |
| 77% (40/52) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (30/45) |
| 50% (7/14) | 2nd Serve Win % | 57% (16/28) |
| 22% (2/9) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/2) |
| 37% (27/73) | Return Points Win % | 29% (19/66) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Corentin Denolly Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Oliver Crawford
Player
Corentin Denolly
68%
(
53 of
78)
1st Serve %
67%
(
46 of
69)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
7
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
38%
(
30 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
69)
80
Total Points Won
67
|
6-2 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Inaki Montes-De La Torre
Player
Corentin Denolly
57%
(
21 of
37)
1st Serve %
66%
(
23 of
35)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
86%
(
18 of
21)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
22%
(
8 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
24 of
35)
53
Total Points Won
19
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Corentin Denolly
Player
Blaise Bicknell
61%
(
42 of
69)
1st Serve %
66%
(
65 of
98)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
57%
(
24 of
42)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
35 of
65)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
41%
(
28 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
47 of
98)
88
Total Points Won
79
|
6-3 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Geoffrey Blancaneaux
Player
Corentin Denolly
72%
(
42 of
58)
1st Serve %
61%
(
39 of
64)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
60%
(
25 of
42)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
24 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
64)
67
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Patrick Maloney
Player
Corentin Denolly
59%
(
44 of
75)
1st Serve %
63%
(
52 of
82)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
39%
(
29 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
43 of
82)
89
Total Points Won
68
|
6-3 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Corentin Denolly
Player
Benjamin Willwerth
66%
(
51 of
77)
1st Serve %
66%
(
55 of
83)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
2
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
35%
(
9 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
7 of
28)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
44%
(
34 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
45 of
83)
88
Total Points Won
72
|
4-6 6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Aleksandar Kovacevic
Player
Corentin Denolly
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve %
54%
(
38 of
70)
8
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
8
90%
(
28 of
31)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
70)
71
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Corentin Denolly
Player
Brandon Holt
68%
(
74 of
109)
1st Serve %
69%
(
61 of
89)
1
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
0
76%
(
56 of
74)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
43 of
61)
37%
(
13 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
40 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
29 of
89)
98
Total Points Won
100
|
7-6(7) 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Corentin Denolly
Player
Adrian Mannarino
69%
(
89 of
129)
1st Serve %
54%
(
61 of
113)
3
Aces
11
3
Double Faults
7
69%
(
61 of
89)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
48 of
61)
45%
(
18 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
16%
(
3 of
19)
39%
(
50 of
129)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
40 of
113)
119
Total Points Won
123
|
6-4 5-7 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Corentin Denolly
Player
James Kent Trotter
56%
(
40 of
71)
1st Serve %
73%
(
51 of
70)
5
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
3
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
38 of
51)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
24 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
25 of
70)
72
Total Points Won
69
|
6-3 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Hamza Karmoussi Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-0 4-6 10-8 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Benjamin Hassan
Player
Hamza Karmoussi
54%
(
27 of
50)
1st Serve %
54%
(
35 of
65)
6
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
6
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
12 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
65)
67
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Titouan Droguet
Player
Hamza Karmoussi
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve %
71%
(
35 of
49)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
10 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
29
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Corentin Denolly
Player
Hamza Karmoussi
79%
(
52 of
66)
1st Serve %
62%
(
45 of
73)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
77%
(
40 of
52)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
30 of
45)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
19 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
27 of
73)
74
Total Points Won
65
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Paulo Saraiva Dos Santos
Player
Hamza Karmoussi
71%
(
42 of
59)
1st Serve %
74%
(
50 of
68)
6
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
11 of
18)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
18 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
68)
69
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-7(3) 6-2 10-5 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Mehdi Sadaoui
Player
Hamza Karmoussi
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve %
71%
(
27 of
38)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
86%
(
18 of
21)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
8 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
45
Total Points Won
25
|
6-1 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 63% (412/245) | Win/Loss | 43% (12/16) |
| 60% (900/599) | Sets Win/Loss | 42% (26/36) |
| 54% (7528/6445) | Games Win/Loss | 48% (278/301) |
| 56% (61/48) | Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 66% (293/150) | Clay Win/Loss | 43% (12/16) |
| 55% (58/47) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.29 | Aces Per Game | 0.07 |
| 1998 | Aces Total | 19 |
| 0.28 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.17 |
| 1887 | Total Double Faults | 47 |
| 1:26:44 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 499.27 | Average Opponent Rank | 130.32 |
| 65% (26404/40626) | 1st Serve % | 64% (563/873) |
| 67% (17798/26404) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (329/563) |
| 49% (6925/14223) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (147/310) |
| 45% (2081/4615) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (28/60) |
| 43% (17578/41276) | Return Points Win % | 35% (288/817) |
| 40% (2/3) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 75% (3/1) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 44% (52/66) | Challenger W/L | 38% (3/5) |
| 67% (355/175) | Futures W/L | 47% (9/10) |
| 63% (409/648) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 43% (12/28) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 56% (101/179) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/4) |
| 59% (114/192) | Deciding Set Win % | 67% (4/6) |
| 90% (397/358) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 91% (11/10) |
| 10% (397/39) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 9% (11/1) |
| 21% (260/54) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 12% (17/2) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
